Vermont

  Entertainment Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
February 27, 2010
Entertainment
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Entertainment Legal News

 

Playgirl.com Operators to Pay $30 Million to Settle FTC Charges

Agency Alleged Adult Web Sites Illegally Billed Consumers for Web Access Advertised as Free

The owners and operators of www.playgirl.com, www.highsociety.com and scores of other adult entertainment Web sites will pay $30 million to settle Federal Trade Commission and New York State's Attorney General's charges that they illegally billed thousands of consumers for services that were advertised as "free," and billed other consumers who never visited the Web sites at all. The settlement bars the illegal practices in the future, and requires that the defendants post a bond - $2 million for the corporate defendants and $500,000 each for the individual defendants - before they are allowed to continue to market adult entertainment on the Internet.

In August, 2000, the FTC and the New York Attorney General filed suit in U.S. District Court seeking to halt the illegal billing practices. The suit named New York-based Crescent Publishing Group, Inc., its principals, Bruce Chew and David Bernstein, and 64 affiliated corporations that operate the adult entertainment Web sites. According to the complaint, the defendants operated scores of adult entertainment Web sites, deceptively promoting them as "free." The "Free Tour Web Sites" claimed that consumers' credit card numbers were required solely to prove that the consumers were of legal age to view the adult material, and that the credit cards would not be billed. Consumers complained, however, that their cards were billed despite the representations, and other consumers were billed even though they did not visit the defendants' Web sites. Thousands of consumers were charged recurring monthly membership fees ranging from $20 to $90, the complaint alleged. Consumers who tried to dispute the charges were met with a variety of barriers designed by the defendants to thwart their efforts. According to the complaint, the defendants used billing names different than the names of the Web sites, so consumers often had no idea who was billing them or why. Moreover, consumers often had difficulty contacting the defendants to get refunds from the information provided to them on their billing statement.

The Court issued a preliminary injunction that required clear and conspicuous disclosure of charges for any "free" tour of their Web sites and barred the defendants from "charging, debiting or billing consumers" for any Web site services without first obtaining a $10 million bond that could be used "to satisfy any judgment entered against the defendants," following trial. The settlement announced today concludes the case without further litigation.

The settlement bars the defendants from making any misrepresentations in advertising, promoting, offering for sale or selling any products or services. Specifically, it bars them from making misrepresentations about the cost and terms of Web site access, and deceptive representations that credit account information will be used only for age verification. It further bars them from billing any consumers without their prior authorization and requires clear disclosure regarding the amount consumers will be charged and procedures for cancellation before consumers sign up for membership at defendants' sites. If the defendants continue to advertise "free tours" of their adult sites, the settlement requires clear and conspicuous disclosure about: how consumers can exit their sites without incurring charges; when the "free tour" has ended; and that by continuing, consumers will incur fees. The settlement also requires payment of $30 million for consumer redress. In the event that redress proves impractical, the $30 million in ill-gotten gains will be divided equally and turned over to the United States Treasury and the State of New York. The corporate defendants will be required to obtain bonds in the amount of $2 million before marketing adult entertainment on the Internet in the future. Each individual defendant will be required to obtain a bond in the amount of $500,000. Finally, the settlement contains record keeping provisions to allow the FTC to monitor compliance.

 

Contact our Vermont Entertainment Lawyers now and obtain a free case review!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Rights are clearly defined
Rights' are the expressed, granted permission by the owner of a particular work to an intended buyer, for the utilization of their property in the profitable redistribution of that material. The permission, if granted, may entail the right to employ the work in the designated medium in which it was intended for redistribution. Additionally, the Copyright Act protects the owner of a property from unauthorized use of their material.

 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Entertainment cases in Vermont and nationwide:

Merger Between Two Japanese Entertainment Giants Complete
Announcing VIZ Media!

San Francisco, CA, APRIL 4, 2005 — VIZ, LLC and ShoPro Entertainment, Inc., two prominent N...

Read more >


Lofgren Vows To Protect Consumers In The Fight Over Digital Rights Management
Silicon Valley Congresswoman introduces bill to respect consumer rights and expectations

October 2, 2002

Washington, DC – Congressw...

Read more >


FAA Proposes Actions on In-Flight Entertainment Systems
Under today's proposals, operators would have to deactivate or modify the entertainment system, revise crew procedures for removing power fr...
Read more >


More Entertainment News >

 
 

Entertainment Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Copyright

Definition:
A legal term referring to protection granted an individual or organization against the use of an original work without expressed consent.

Distributor

Definition:
From studios to exhibitors, the distributor sells viewing rights for a finished film. Somewhat of an intermediary function, distribution creates initial revenue for the source that financed the project. Its basic function is to sell the viewing rights of a motion picture to specifically designated areas. Based on the elements involved in the feature, the costs of these rights vary and are just a fraction of the income for distributors.

Management Company

Definition:
The umbrella under which a group of managers function as a single incorporated entity. Long known for small client lists and focused attention on development of clients, management companies, in the last decade, have, in most cases, shifted their role in the market. Today, most management companies perform dually as client representation and producer.

More Entertainment Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Search Site

 
 

Entertainment Law Resources

 


Search Entertainment Law resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

Entertainment Law Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Entertainment Law:

  • Trademark Violations
  • Copywriting Infringement
  • Film Finance Negotiations
  • Intellectual Property Theft
  • Plagiarism

More Entertainment Law Topics >

Vermont Entertainment Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Entertainment attorney you should contact our Entertainment Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Barre
  • Bennington
  • Brattleboro
  • Burlington
  • Colchester
  • Essex Junction
  • Milton
  • Montpelier
  • Rutland
  • Saint Albans
  • South Burlington
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Vermont Entertainment Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.